Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 694 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610T - 231 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
338
57.97598627787307%
Multi-Core
594
32.79955825510768%
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |