Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3081 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1610T - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
