Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610T - 248 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |