Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2057
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2057
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 644 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 153 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
129
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.