Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G640 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G640 is 183 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $21.94 vs $27.05
- Up to 20% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G1610 - $0.16 vs $0.2 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2432 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |