Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2520 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $27.05 vs $1096.05
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 55 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 162 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77156 minutes ago
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
23.93258426966292%
Multi-Core
739
8.597021870637505%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 127 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |