Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $27.05 vs $413.13
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i9-10900X - $0.26 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 37% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
73.125%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5320 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.87/FPS
9.059233449477352%
Price, €
€458.57
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.03045685279188%
Multi-Core
739
7.886031373385978%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |