Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 918 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $27.05 vs $127.23
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75405 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €141.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
83.69351669941061%
Multi-Core
739
41.96479273140261%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.