Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $27.05 vs $73.12
- Up to 60% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-4930K - $0.33 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 9% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1610 - 98 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |