Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $350
Availability
MSRP in USD: $350
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790K is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-4790K - $27.05 vs $106.02
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-4790K - $0.21 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790K - 55 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 151 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
144
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5192 minutes ago
Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 88 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.