Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $27.05 vs $54.58
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 14% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610 - 176 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75410 minutes ago
Buy for €60.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
31.48558758314856%
Multi-Core
739
15.564448188711037%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |