Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $27.05 vs $40.41
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1610 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75471 minutes ago
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
37.011294526498695%
Multi-Core
739
22.710510141364473%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |