Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 453 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $27.05 vs $38.66
- Up to 27% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-4460T - $0.11 vs $0.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 281 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
273
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4460T I5 4460T 1.9 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for €42.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.