Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $27.05 vs $174.73
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 57% better in New World than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€193.95
15%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €193.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.507826720058246%
Multi-Core
739
4.7940317872202405%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |