Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $27.05 vs $179.14
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600K - $0.18 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610 - 215 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12705 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
19%
Price, €
€198.85
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €198.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |