Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $27.05 vs $149.16
- Up to 80% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-8100T - $0.16 vs $0.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1610 - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
188
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Intel CM8068403377415 Core i3-8100T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.