Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $27.05 vs $67.25
- Up to 51% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-3220 - $0.61 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 22% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - 60 vs 49 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
49
81.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44028 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
49.193548387096776%
Price, €
€74.65
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
81.14285714285714%
Multi-Core
739
68.11059907834101%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |