Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 185 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 47% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $14.32 vs $27.05
- Up to 45% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - $0.11 vs $0.2 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G550 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.6 GHz 2M 65W LGA 1155
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.