Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
2.6 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
2.6 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
MSRP in USD: $549
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1732 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
27%
Price, €
€120.93
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.