Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $27.05 vs $136.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 11% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 758 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
758
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.96
19%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.21686746987952%
Multi-Core
739
12.088990675609356%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |