Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2787 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $27.05 vs $131.6
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.2 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
23%
Price, €
€146.08
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |