Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $27.05 vs $123.2
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.04 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 19% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 801 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
672
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
801
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
23%
Price, €
€136.75
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |