Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3409 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4500 - $27.05 vs $50.45
- Up to 42% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 4500 - $0.11 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 297 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
273
91.91919191919192%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
297
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
57.89473684210527%
Price, €
€56
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.395498392282956%
Multi-Core
739
11.921277625423455%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |