Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2486 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - $27.05 vs $91.4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 125% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1610 - 205 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.395498392282956%
Multi-Core
739
12.632478632478634%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |