Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1669 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 287 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
273
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.