Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2798 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron B830 - 181 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 20 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |