Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2500 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Celeron B830 - 524 vs 499 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
524
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |