Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 52 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Celeron B830 - 684 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
684
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |