Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3595 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B815 - 130 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |