Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3677 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Celeron B815 - 131 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Core i7-12700
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
