Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1339 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron B815 - 455 vs 442 FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
455
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |