Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 337 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 4% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron B815 - 105 vs 101 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |