Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3238 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 144% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron 847 - 183 vs 75 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €200.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |