Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1535 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 93% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 847 - 27 vs 14 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
27
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €44.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |