Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4118 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 17 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 847 - 590 vs 496 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 32 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
590
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€418.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €418.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |