Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800H is 3123 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 4800H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than Celeron 847 - 116 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 7 4800H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 448SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
