Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 1213 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron 3865U - 267 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 16 vs 2 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
