Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1589 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron 3865U - 137 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
