Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2207 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Celeron 3205U - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17813 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |