Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 859 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Celeron 3205U - 166 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |