Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Valorant than Celeron 2955U - 869 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
869
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |