Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1663 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 1037U - 181 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |