Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3271 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 101% better in War Thunder than Celeron 1007U - 243 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 20 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |