Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 2782 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 21% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 1000M - 276 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
