Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3271 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 1000M - 378 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
378
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |