Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1502 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Celeron 1000M - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €204.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
29.55223880597015%
Multi-Core
511
10.019607843137255%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |