Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 466 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron 1000M - 194 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |