Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3780 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of FX-9590
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $233.77 vs $351.41
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900K - $1.70 vs $1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 42% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-9590 - 218 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €259.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
95%
Price, €
€390.07
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |