The FX-8370E is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-3450 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $105.42 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8370E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-3450
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 55% cheaper – $85.58 vs $191.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 77 vs 95 Watts
FX-8370E vs Core i5-3450
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€85.58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
FX-8370E vs Core i5-3450 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370E vs Core i5-3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370E vs Core i5-3450 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8370E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $1.99 | MSRP | $1.74 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
