Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $146.90 vs $604.65
- Up to 66% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.07 vs $3.15 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 40% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - 213 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €163.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
34%
Price, €
€671.16
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |